Impact of improving infection control and antibiotic stewardship practices on nosocomial infections and antimicrobial resistance in an oncology centre from India

Background: Improving basic infection control (IC) practices, diagnostics and anti-microbial stewardship (AMS) are key tools to handle antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Material(s) and Method(s): This is a retrospective study done over 6 years (2016-2021) in an oncology centre in North India with many on-going interventions to improve IC practices, diagnostics and AMS. This study looked into AMR patterns from clinical isolates, rates of hospital acquired infections (HAI) and clinical outcomes. Result(s): Over all, 98,915 samples were sent for culture from 158,191 admitted patients. Most commonly isolated organism was E. coli (n = 6951;30.1%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5801;25.1%) and Pseudomonas aeroginosa (n = 3041;13.1%). VRE (Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus) rates fell down from 43.5% in Jan-June 2016 to 12.2% in July-Dec 2021, same was seen in CR (carbapenem resistant) Pseudomonas (23.0%-20.6%, CR Acinetobacter (66.6%-17.02%) and CR E. coli (21.6%-19.4%) over the same study period. Rate of isolation of Candida spp. from non-sterile sites also showed reduction (1.68 per 100 patients to 0.65 per 100 patients). Incidence of health care associated infections also fell from 2.3 to 1.19 per 1000 line days for CLABSI, 2.28 to 1.88 per 1000 catheter days for CAUTI. There was no change in overall mortality rates across the study period. Conclusion(s): This study emphasizes the point that improving compliance to standard IC recommendations and improving diagnostics can help in reducing the burden of antimicrobial resistance.Copyright © 2023 Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists

Secondary Infections in Patients with Extremely Severe COVID-19 During ECMO Therapy.

Up to 70% of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 need respiratory support, up to 10% need high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive and invasive ventilation. However, standard methods of respiratory support are ineffective in 0.4-0.5% of patients. In case of potentially reversible critical refractory respiratory failure that patients may require ECMO. Management of patients with extremely severe COVID-19 associates with numerous clinical challenges, including critical illness, multiple organ dysfunction, blood coagulation disorders, requiring prolonged ICU stay and care, use of multiple pharmacotherapies including immunosuppressive drugs. Pharmacological suppression of immunity is associated with a significant increase in the risk of secondary bacterial and fungal infections. Currently, data on epidemiology of secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 undergoing ECMO is limited. Aim. To study the prevalence and etiology of secondary infections associated with positive blood cultures in patients with extremely severe COVID-19 requiring ECMO. Materials and methods. A single-center retrospective non-interventional epidemiological study including 125 patients with extremely severe COVID-19 treated with ECMO in April 2020 to December 2021. Results. Out of 700 blood culture tests performed in 125 patients during the study, 250 tests were positive confirming bacteremia/fungemia. Isolated pathogens varied depending on the duration of ECMO: gram-positive bacteria (primarily coagulase-negative staphylococci) dominated from the initiation of ECMO support;increased duration of ECMO associated with an increasing the proportion of pathogens common in ICU (Klebsiella pneumoniae and/or Acinetobacter baumannii with extensively drug resistant and pan-drug resistant phenotypes, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium). When ECMO lasted more than 7-14 days, opportunistic pathogens (Candida species, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Providencia stuartii, non-diphtheria corynebacteria, Burkholderia species and others) prevailed as etiological agents. Conclusion. Longer duration of ECMO resulted in increasing the rates of infectious complications. In patients undergoing ECMO for more than 14 days, the microbiological landscape becomes extremely diverse, which hampers choosing an empirical antimicrobial therapy. Since potential pathogens causing secondary infections in patients during ECMO are difficult to predict, rapid identification of rare opportunistic pathogens and their sensitivity profile, followed by targeted administration of antimicrobials, seems most beneficial.Copyright © 2023, V.A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology. All rights reserved.

Rapid Diagnostics in Infection Prevention

There are several relevant pathogens in healthcare today that are easily transmissible among populations and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In order to decrease transmission, it is important to identify infected patients quickly so that infection prevention techniques can be employed. Rapid diagnostic tests assist with this as they often produce results 24-48 h faster than traditional culture and sensitivity methods. This chapter discusses the benefits and limitations of rapid diagnostic tests overall, as well as considerations for rapid diagnostics for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE), Clostridioides difficile, Candida auris, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and influenza. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Things that dropped off during COVID

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic placed a renewed focus on transmission of respiratory infections in healthcare settings. However, little is known about the direct and indirect impacts on surveillance and infection prevention and control activities to limit transmission of other communicable diseases such as multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Method(s): We conducted retrospective cross-sectional audits of compliance with routine screening and cleaning practices for MDROs (including vancomycin-resistant enterococci [VRE] and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-[ESBL]-producing and carbapenemase-producing [CPE] Enterobacterales) in a tertiary hospital, where patients admitted to high-risk wards are screened upon admission and weekly. We correlated this with observed transmission events and an organisation-wide point-prevalence survey for MDRO colonisation. Result(s): Compliance with routine MDRO screening practices was lower than pre-pandemic. Additionally, interventions to limit environmental contamination with CPE had been neglected during the pandemic. This corresponded with an increase in CPE transmission. Audits of clinical staff infection prevention and control practices found missed opportunities to screen and identify colonised patients, as well as curtailed control measures during the pandemic, both correlating with MDRO transmission. Conclusion(s): Ongoing engagement of staff and senior decision makers in healthcare facilities is critical to maintaining infection control standards. At our institution, we found a lapse in standards during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in MDRO transmission.Copyright © 2022

A UNIQUE CASE: ACUTE EOSINOPHILIC PNEUMONIA SECONDARY TO DAPTOMYCIN: A COVID-19 PNEUMONIA MIMIC

SESSION TITLE: Drug-Induced Lung Injury Pathology Case Posters SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 01:45 pm INTRODUCTION: Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is an atypical cause of acute hypoxic respiratory failure in adults, however if not identified can prove to be fatal. It can all be a COVID19 mimic during the pandemic. AEP has several causes, such as inhalational drugs, infections and various pharmaceuticals. Often, patients will have an acute respiratory syndrome for less than one-month, pulmonary infiltrates on chest computed tomography (CT) or radiography (CXR), in addition to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) with more than 25% of eosinophils. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79 y/o man underwent an elective total knee replacement complicated by acute lower limb ischemia from an occluded bypass graft. He developed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) joint and soft tissue infection of the lower extremity. He was prescribed a 6-week course of Daptomycin. He presented about 3 weeks into treatment with shortness of breath. He was initially diagnosed with acute on chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation and COVID negative. He was initially treated with diuretics. He developed acute renal failure requiring dialysis and acute hypoxic respiratory failure requiring intubation. CXR revealed bilateral lung infiltrates with BAL having 80% eosinophils, eosinophilia and urinalysis positive for eosinophils. Daptomycin was discontinued and he was started on systemic steroids for a two-week course. He was successfully extubated 5 days after diagnosis of AEP and was subsequently discharged to a rehabilitation facility on lifelong Doxycycline for MRSA prosthetic joint infection prophylaxis. DISCUSSION: AEP related to Daptomycin was first reported in 2007, in a patient that developed the condition after receiving treatment for endocarditis. Daptomycin caused an inflammatory reaction within the lungs, due to an accumulation of the drug within the pulmonary surfactant. Our case report patient met all components for AEP diagnosis, in addition to symptom onset being approximately 3 weeks into treatment. The ultimate treatment for AEP is to stop the reversible cause, if identifiable, along with glucocorticoids and symptomatic support. Prognosis for patients with AEP is excellent when diagnosis is prompt, and usually infiltrates are resolved within 1 month without long term adverse pulmonary effects. Our patient was discharged to an acute rehab facility without supplemental oxygen therapy and continues to improve from functional standpoint. This case a definite cause of AEP from Daptomycin presented as COVID19 pneumonia mimic. It highlights the importance of rapid diagnosis to prevent morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The differential in a patient with acute hypoxic respiratory failure is numerous, especially during the COVID19 pandemic. During these challenging times, it is important to think of atypical causes, such as AEP to improve the patient's clinical status. Reference #1: Allen JN, Pacht ER, Gadek JE, Davis WB. Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia as a Reversible Cause of Noninfectious Respiratory Failure. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:569-574 Reference #2: Hayes Jr. D, Anstead MI, Kuhn RJ. Eosinophilic pneumonia induced by daptomycin. J Infect. 2007;54(4):e211-213. Reference #3: Rachid M, Ahmad K, Saunders-Kurban M, Fatima A, Shah A, Nahhas A. Daptomycin-Induced Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia: Late Onset and Quick Recovery. Case Reports in Pulmonology. 2017. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Moses Bachan No relevant relationships by Zinobia Khan No relevant relationships by Kaitlyn Mehern

LIKELIHOOD OF ENDOSCOPY CANCELLATION BASED ON VANCOMYCINRESISTANT ENTEROCOCCI (VRE) COLONIZATION STATUS AND INFECTION CONTROL PRACTICES

Background: “Terminal cleaning” is a practice of rigorous cleaning of endoscopy suite following endoscopies for patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterocci (VRE) with the intention of reducing VRE transmission. Such practice entails double-wiping all surfaces including the floor with disinfectants before a non-VRE patient can use the endoscopy room. While intuitive, such time-consuming practice is not supported by evidence and may have unintended negative impact on patient access to timely endoscopic evaluation. Aims: To determine whether terminal cleaning of endoscopy suite for VRE-colonized patients has any negative impact on inpatient access to timely endoscopic evaluation. Methods: As part of a quality improvement study, inpatient endoscopy data was gathered over a 3-month period between February 2021 and April 2021 at a tertiary centre. EUS, ERCP, and travel cases outside of the endoscopy suite were excluded. The cancellation rates were compared between VRE-colonized patients and non-VRE patients using the Fisher's exact test. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 262 inpatient endoscopic procedures were scheduled and included in the study. Sixty-six (25.2%) of inpatient procedures were cancelled during this period (Table 1). A total of 24 procedures were scheduled for VRE patients, 9 of which were cancelled because of insufficient operating time and two due to concurrent carbapenamase-producing organism carriage and poor bowel preparation. In the non-VRE group, 55 (23.3%) procedures were cancelled for various reasons (Table 1). In subgroup analysis where cancellations related to COVID-19 (n=14) were omitted, VRE patients had a significantly higher rate of procedure cancellations compared to non-VRE patients (42.3% vs. 18.5%;p<0.01). Conclusions: The overall endoscopy cancellation rate for VRE-colonized patients was higher than those who were non-VRE-colonized. We propose that this is likely secondary to the delays from unnecessary terminal cleans imposed for VRE-colonized patients and await for postintervention data. (Table Presented).

Health Care–Associated Infections: Best Practices for Prevention

Health care–associated infections (HAIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Common examples include catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line–associated bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, surgical site infections, and Clostridioides difficile infections. Standardized infection control processes and precautions have been shown to reduce the rate of HAIs, and targeted practices for HAIs have shown further reductions. Patient safety tools have been developed for various HAIs to help guide administrators and are free for public use through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention STRIVE (States Targeting Reduction in Infections via Engagement) initiative. The Choosing Wisely initiative makes best practice recommendations for physicians to improve quality of care and reduce costs;targeted recommendations were developed to reduce the risk of HAIs. For example, using invasive devices only when indicated and for the shortest time possible reduces the risk of device-related HAIs. The goal of antibiotic stewardship is to reduce C. difficile infections and further development of multidrug-resistant organisms such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antibiotic stewardship targets physician behaviors such as reviewing antibiotic therapy choices every 48 to 72 hours, reviewing culture results as soon as available, de-escalating antibiotic therapy when appropriate, and documenting the indications for initiating and continuing antibiotic therapy.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare-Associated Infections

Background. The profound changes wrought by COVID-19 on routine hospital operations may have influenced performance on hospital measures, including healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Objective. Evaluate the association between COVID-19 surges and HAI or cluster rates Methods. Design: Prospective cohort study Setting. 148 HCA Healthcare-affiliated hospitals, 3/1/2020-9/30/2020, and a subset of hospitals with microbiology and cluster data through 12/31/2020 Patients. All inpatients Measurements. We evaluated the association between COVID-19 surges and HAIs, hospital-onset pathogens, and cluster rates using negative binomial mixed models. To account for local variation in COVID-19 pandemic surge timing, we included the number of discharges with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis per staffed bed per month at each hospital. Results. Central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia increased as COVID-19 burden increased (P ≤ 0.001 for all), with 60% (95% CI, 23 to 108%) more CLABSI, 43% (95% CI, 8 to 90%) more CAUTI, and 44% (95% CI, 10 to 88%) more cases of MRSA bacteremia than expected over 7 months based on predicted HAIs had there not been COVID-19 cases. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) was not significantly associated with COVID-19 burden. Microbiology data from 81 of the hospitals corroborated the findings. Notably, rates of hospital-onset bloodstream infections and multidrug resistant organisms, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and Gram-negative organisms were each significantly associated with COVID-19 surges (P < 0.05 for all). Finally, clusters of hospital-onset pathogens increased as the COVID-19 burden increased (P = 0.02). Limitations. Variations in surveillance and reporting may affect HAI data. Table 1. Effect of an increase in number of COVID-19 discharges on HAIs and hospital-onset pathogens Figure 1. Predicted mean HAI rates as COVID-19 discharges increase Predicted mean HAI rate by increasing monthly COVID-19 discharges. Panel a. CLABSI, Panel b, CAUTI Panel c. MRSA Bacteremia, Panel d. CDI. Data are stratified by small, medium and large hospitals. Figure 2. Monthly comparison of COVID discharges to clusters COVID-19 discharges and the number of clusters of hospital-onset pathogens are correlated throughout the pandemic. Conclusion. COVID-19 surges adversely impact HAI rates and clusters of infections within hospitals, emphasizing the need for balancing COVID-related demands with routine hospital infection prevention.

The Role of the Environment in Healthcare-associated Transmission of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus: A Proof of Concept Study

Background. Transmission of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) from environment to patient and patient to patient can both occur in healthcare settings. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a cohort of exposed patients on an inpatient unit with an extensive VRE outbreak needed to switch physical locations with a non-exposed patient population. By comparing outcomes of both cohorts, we aimed to determine the role of the physical environment (both direct and indirect contact) as compared to the patient population, in ongoing VRE transmission. Methods. From 10 March to 21 April 2021, 41 new nosocomial acquisitions of VRE were detected as part of a VRE outbreak on a 34-bed acute care unit. Prior to the switch of units, extensive cleaning of the unit was conducted including electrostatic adjuncts to standard cleaning and environmental swabbing for VRE yielded no positive surfaces. The exposed cohort included 3 of 30 patients with VRE while the non-exposed cohort had 0 of 28 VRE positive patients based on prevalence testing on 21 April 2021. Following the physical relocation of both cohorts on 22 April, 2021, prospective VRE screening was performed on both units for one month including on admission, discharge and weekly prevalence screening. Hand hygiene compliance rates on both units was measured using group electronic monitoring. Results. Figure 1 depicts the timeline and number of VRE cases before and after the unit switch. Following relocation of the VRE exposed cohort to the new unit, no further VRE transmission was detected (0/235 VRE screens;0 VRE cases per 1000 patient days). Conversely, there were new VRE transmissions (3/99 VRE screens, 5 VRE cases per 1000 patient days) in the non-exposed cohort. When the units resumed their original location, one additional case of VRE was identified in the exposed cohort upon return to their original location. These transmissions occurred despite HH compliance of 94% (141,610/150,706) during the entire study period on the outbreak unit, which was consistently higher than on the non-outbreak unit (141,589/227,136, 62%). Conclusion. The environmental reservoir for VRE may be more important in transmission than the patient reservoir. These findings underscore the importance of environmental cleaning to contain VRE outbreaks.

Changes in Cleaning Practices and Non-conventional Personal Protective Equipment Use due to SARS-CoV-2 and Association with Increases in Multi-drug Resistant Organism Cases

Background. During the pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), policy at a Minnesota hospital changed to state that environmental services would not clean rooms of patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infections, requiring nursing staff to perform these duties. Investigation of a cluster of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in patients hospitalized in the same or adjoining rooms on the medical intensive care unit (MICU) raised concern over whether SARS-CoV-2 cleaning practices and non-conventional personal protective equipment (PPE) use led to transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). Methods. Infection Prevention conducts passive surveillance for MDRO acquisition in inpatient units. Passive surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 was performed early in the pandemic. Active surveillance SARS-CoV-2 testing on admission was initiated in July 2020 and active surveillance testing for admitted patients every 7 days was initiated in December. Incident cases of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing organisms (ESBL), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and CRE were determined for hospitalized patients between March 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021, excluding patients with infection on admission. Rates of hospitalized patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 per 100 patient days were compared to rates of patients testing positive for VRE, ESBL, MRSA, and CRE per 100 patient days respectively. The same rate comparisons were completed for the MICU. Using the F-Test Two-Sample to determine variance, the Two-Sample T-test assuming unequal variances was applied to each comparison. Results. Correlation was significant between rates of SARS-CoV-2 and VRE (p< 0.005), ESBL (p< 0.005), MRSA (p< 0.005), and CRE (p< 0.005) (Table 1). MICU correlation was significant between rates of SARS-CoV-2 and VRE (p< 0.005), ESBL (p< 0.005), MRSA (p< 0.005), and CRE (p< 0.005) (Table 2). Conclusion. The relationships between the rates of SARS-CoV-2 and four MDROs were statistically significant. It can be inferred from this data that changes in hospital cleaning and non-conventional PPE use may have led to an increase in transmission of MDROs in this facility.

Nutritional status and the critically Ill patient: Gut microbiota and immuno-nutrition in I.C.U. At the time of SARS-COV 2 pandemic

Background: Gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem of bacteria, viruses, archaea, protozoa and yeasts in our intestine. It has several functions, including maintaining human body equilibrium. Microbial “dysbiosis” can be responsible for outbreak of local and systemic infections, especially in critically ill patients. Methods: to build a narrative review, we performed a Pubmed, Medline and EMBASE search for English language papers, reviews, meta-analyses, case series and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by keywords and their associations: critically ill patient;nutrition;gut microbiota;probiotics;gut virome;SARS-COV 2. Results: Over the antibiotic-based “selective decontamination”, potentially responsible for drug-resistant microorganisms development, there is growing interest of scientists and the pharmaceutical industry for pre-, probiotics and their associations as safe and reliable remedies restoring gut microbial “eubiosis”. Very first encouraging evidences link different gut microbiota profiles with SARS-COV 2 disease stage and gravity. Thus, there is frame for a probiotic therapeutic approach of COVID-19. Conclusions: gut microbiota remodulation seems to be a promising and safe therapeutic approach to prevent local and systemic multi-resistant bug infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This approach deserves more and more attention at the time of SARS-COV 2 pandemic.

Does the removal of contact precautions for MRSA and VRE infected patients change health care-associated infection rate?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Update existing meta-analysis to analyze if discontinuation of contact precautions (CPs) for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization or infection affects hospital-associated MRSA or VRE infection rates. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of 17 studies evaluating discontinuation of CPs for MRSA and VRE. Random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to determine the pooled risk ratios (RR) of preincidence hospital-associated infection rate to postincidence rate. Subgroup analysis was used to assess sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: No significant difference between rates of hospital-associated MRSA infection before and after stopping the CPs was observed (RR, 0.84; 95% confidence internal [CI], 0.71-1.01; P = .06). An inverse association was observed between discontinuation of CPs and rates of hospital-associated VRE infection (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; P = .005). A subgroup analysis of 6 studies that used chlorhexidine, showed no difference between rates of hospital-associated MRSA infection with discontinuation of CPs (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00; P = .05). In 5 studies that did not use chlorhexidine, there was no difference between rates of hospital-associated MRSA infection with discontinuation of CPs (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.55-1.88; P= .95). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in rates of hospital-associated MRSA infection before and after removing CPs. Additionally, there were decreased rates of hospital-associated VRE infection following stoppage of CPs.

The interface between COVID-19 and bacterial healthcare-associated infections.

BACKGROUND: A wide range of bacterial infections occur in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, particularly in those with severe coronaviral disease. Some of these are community-acquired co-infections. OBJECTIVE: To review recent data that indicate the occurrence of hospital-onset bacterial infections, including with antibiotic-resistant isolates, in COVID-19 patients. SOURCES: Using PubMed, the literature was searched using terms including: 'COVID-19'; 'SARS-CoV-2'; 'bacterial infection'; 'healthcare-associated infection'; 'antibiotic resistance'; 'antimicrobial resistance'; 'multi-drug resistance'; 'Streptococcus'; 'Staphylococcus'; 'Pseudomonas'; 'Escherichia'; 'Klebsiella'; 'Enterococcus'; 'Acinetobacter'; 'Haemophilus'; 'MRSA'; 'VRE'; 'ESBL'; 'NDM-CRE'; 'CR-Ab'; 'VRSA'; 'MDR'. CONTENT: There is a growing number of reports of bacterial infections acquired by patients with severe COVID-19 after hospital admission. Antibiotic-resistant pathogens found to cause healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in COVID-19 patients include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase Klebsiella pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. COVID-19 has impacted bacterial HAIs in a number of ways with an increase in the incidence of New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii reported at some hospital sites compared with before the pandemic. Recommended guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship in COVID-19 patient treatment are discussed regarding minimization of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Other studies have reported a decrease in methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci cases, which has been attributed to enhanced infection prevention and control practices introduced to minimize intra-hospital spread of COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS: Poorer outcomes have been observed in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with an antibiotic-resistant infection. Although heightened IPC measures have been accompanied by a reduction in some HAIs at specific sites, in other situations, COVID-19 has been associated with an increase in bacterial HAI incidence. Further research is needed to define the cost-benefit relationship of maintaining COVID-19-related infection prevention and control protocols beyond the pandemic to reduce the burden of HAIs. In addition, the longer-term impact of high usage of certain broad-spectrum antibiotics during the COVID-19 pandemic requires evaluation.